-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Toseland a ?crit :
> On Wednesday 12 December 2007 10:41, freenetwork at web.de wrote:
>> Well. For my personal taste it is necessary to be technical to a degree.
>> To propose to use "Freenet" for everything is not correct.
>>
>> There is
>> - the "Freenet Project" - the overall project, just like "Mozilla
> Firefox", "Microsoft Windows", etc.
>> - the "Freenet" - the network and it's structure - like "the Internet"
>> - the "Freenet", again - as the complete concept how the network shall work
>> - the "node" - a more theoretical descrition of a participant, a
> singe "point", of and within the network
>> - the node's implementation "FRED" ("Freenet REference Daemon") - the java
> program within the .jar, that, when run, provides functionalies of a node
>> - the node's HTTP-user interface "FProxy" - to browse freesites, enter other
> node/FRED references, see statistics, etc.
>> and you want to smush everything together to a single term "Freenet" ?!!
>
> No, in this case it is being used as "the application Freenet", which is
> quite
> specific and reasonably obvious to the user.
Agreed. We can be as technical as we want in the documentation, but I
think the main interface should be as simple as possible.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHX+Ugo6N05NzaOvURAi3GAJ96fVpZtgLO/DJAACnnLGBK5IQuIgCfcO0x
8T90A+BhqgYMp4KDFLMvbJA=
=S4u9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
