-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Right. I made my noob-test again and these sentences are better. The subject understood that he already had some security and he could improve it later.
So, it's OK for me. Colin Davis a ?crit : > I think that we do want to imply that opennet is insecure. It IS > insecure. Just less insecure than the public internet. > Keep in mind, we strongly want to encourage people to connect to the > darknet, but because it -is- more secure, and because it makes the > network stronger/more resilient. > > I think that "minimally protected" and "turn on Secure mode", emphasize > that they are better off than the public internet, but not yet where > they should be. > > > Julien Cornuwel wrote: > Colin Davis a ?crit : > >>>> Your Freenet node is only minimally protected. Your machine is currently >>>> hiding from most people, but it's doing so by connecting to strangers. >>>> If you connect to friends you already know and trust, Freenet will be >>>> better able to protect you. >>>> >>>> Please get some connections to people you trust, and add them to your >>>> Friends page as soon as possible. >>>> Once you have at least 10 Friends, turn on Secure mode and your node >>>> will become invisible to the outside world. >>>> > Seems to me that "Secure mode" still implies that opennet is insecure. > What about "Invisible mode" ? > _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHYslko6N05NzaOvURApFsAJ4rZAIoICrfDB+xr0R+3KUPPDk+UgCfZXZY UYk3Oi/zLtobir2SE/1nFtA= =VhVx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
