On Feb 26, 2008, at 10:17 AM, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > * Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2008-02-26 15:30:40]: > >> On Monday 25 February 2008 21:21, Ian Clarke wrote: >>> Here we go, this is on a MacBook Pro running OSX 10.5. >> >> Hmmm, both this and robert's runs show a very slight reduction in >> the amount >> of CPU that a lower priority thread gets, but nowhere near what I'd >> expect... >> >> Nextgens, can you please post a jar with a more aggressive priority >> difference? > > Here it is > <Sandbox.jar>
Update: Run without using yield() ========================= totalCount=1174099, count/ms=117.398 PC0: priority=1, 13.48%, count=158298 PC1: priority=10, 45.24%, count=531164 PC2: priority=10, 41.28%, count=484637 Run using yield() ================= totalCount=868101, count/ms=86.81 PC0: priority=1, 31.4%, count=272613 PC1: priority=10, 34.43%, count=298928 PC2: priority=10, 34.16%, count=296560 NB: I had to recompile it, some java version thing... -- Robert Hailey -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080226/867e5215/attachment.html>
