On Tuesday 26 February 2008 17:51, Robert Hailey wrote: > > On Feb 26, 2008, at 10:17 AM, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > > * Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2008-02-26 15:30:40]: > > > >> On Monday 25 February 2008 21:21, Ian Clarke wrote: > >>> Here we go, this is on a MacBook Pro running OSX 10.5. > >> > >> Hmmm, both this and robert's runs show a very slight reduction in > >> the amount > >> of CPU that a lower priority thread gets, but nowhere near what I'd > >> expect... > >> > >> Nextgens, can you please post a jar with a more aggressive priority > >> difference? > > > > Here it is > > <Sandbox.jar> > > Update: > > Run without using yield() > ========================= > totalCount=1174099, count/ms=117.398 > PC0: priority=1, 13.48%, count=158298 > PC1: priority=10, 45.24%, count=531164 > PC2: priority=10, 41.28%, count=484637
Oooh, this is interesting... dbkr had the 33/33/33. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080227/f944c3d6/attachment.pgp>
