On Friday 11 January 2008 19:06, Michael Rogers wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > >> Not just leaves, but perhaps nodes whose neighbours all belong to > >> different clusters? > > > > Yeah, this could be a problem... Dunno how we'd deal with that... > > I guess if opennet nodes are going to be excluded from premix routing > then some darknet nodes could also be excluded.
Opennet nodes might have a completely different premix routing mechanism, something closer to I2P (more opportunity for cheating at the peer selection layer). > > I have some notes somewhere on various ways of defining cluster and > cliques... I'll see if there's anything that could be used to agree on > the membership of a cell. That would be useful. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080111/bdffc53f/attachment.pgp>
