On Jan 15, 2008, at 1:57 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Big stuff: (5 weeks essential, 5 weeks important, 15 weeks good-if- > possible) > > [0] Enough seednodes to survive a MAJOR slashdotting. That probably > means some > form of auto-harvesting. (1-3 weeks) > [0] Ultra Lightweight Passive Requests. Essential for web of trust > based chat > applications, and generally useful. (2 weeks)
On Jan 18, 2008, at 12:07 PM, Ian Clarke wrote: > Wow, I'm surprised that there are a few things that *aren't* a > precondition for 0.7.0. > > I think we really need to change our perception about timeline here, > you are sticking features in here as requirements for 0.7.0 when there > is no *way* they need to be requirements for 0.7.0. We should be > aiming to release 0.7.0 in March 2008, and we should cull features > until that becomes realistic. I think that the fatal timeout problem should be nailed down before 0.7. From my investigation I think that it is caused by a problem in the link layer (Message->packet->Message) where Messages are either dropped or duplicated (albeit, somewhat rarely). -- Robert Hailey -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080118/de3f9538/attachment.html>
