On Friday 18 January 2008 18:34, Robert Hailey wrote: > > On Jan 15, 2008, at 1:57 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > Big stuff: (5 weeks essential, 5 weeks important, 15 weeks good-if- > > possible) > > > > [0] Enough seednodes to survive a MAJOR slashdotting. That probably > > means some > > form of auto-harvesting. (1-3 weeks) > > [0] Ultra Lightweight Passive Requests. Essential for web of trust > > based chat > > applications, and generally useful. (2 weeks) > > > > On Jan 18, 2008, at 12:07 PM, Ian Clarke wrote: > > Wow, I'm surprised that there are a few things that *aren't* a > > precondition for 0.7.0. > > > > I think we really need to change our perception about timeline here, > > you are sticking features in here as requirements for 0.7.0 when there > > is no *way* they need to be requirements for 0.7.0. We should be > > aiming to release 0.7.0 in March 2008, and we should cull features > > until that becomes realistic. > > I think that the fatal timeout problem should be nailed down before 0.7. > > From my investigation I think that it is caused by a problem in the > link layer (Message->packet->Message) where Messages are either > dropped or duplicated (albeit, somewhat rarely).
Do you have any more detail? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080118/c441e2cf/attachment.pgp>
