On Tuesday 22 January 2008 22:20, Robert Hailey wrote:
>
> On Jan 22, 2008, at 4:06 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> >> I have tested it, in the little simulator (20 nodes) and am running
> >> this on my node now. The simulator works fine (CHK), my node has
> >> locked up once with pInstantReject=100%{Outputbandwidth liability},
> >> but I am not sure if it was running pre or post r17192 (forgot to set
> >> this.status), so I just restarted it. Given the nature of r17192, the
> >> symptoms make sense (thinking that every request is a failure for
> >> byte
> >> logging).
> >
> > Either way that's a bug we need to deal with...
>
> To clarify, I meant that upon realizing the pInstantReject, I
> restarted it w/ post r17192 for testing; not that I ignored it. Thus
> far (1 hour, 35k requests) I have not had any problems.
So you think it might have been fixed by 17192?
I found a problem with sendTerminal(), fixed that in 17199...
>
> --
> Robert Hailey
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080122/0c344947/attachment.pgp>
