On Tuesday 22 January 2008 22:58, Juiceman wrote: > On Jan 22, 2008 5:53 PM, Juiceman <juiceman69 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jan 22, 2008 5:20 PM, Robert Hailey <robert at freenetproject.org> wrote: > > > > > To clarify, I meant that upon realizing the pInstantReject, I restarted > > > it w/ post r17192 for testing; not that I ignored it. Thus far (1 hour, 35k > > > requests) I have not had any problems. > > > > > > > > I ran it yesterday but had to revert back to stable. My node was only > > using 40 or so threads, had 10 "transfers" but had over 400 SSK request > > handlers running! Bandwidth usage was about 50% of normal. It was up for > > at least 4hrs before I killed it. > > It didn't look right to me, and since I run a seednode I couldn't leave it > > like that. It deserves some more testing time in trunk, but I wouldn't > > release it right away. > > > > I will load r17200 and see if the problem reoccurs.
17202 please. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080122/add67678/attachment.pgp>
