Matthew Toseland wrote: > Any comments? It's a fair chunk of code but it would avoid the need to > include > sun.* private classes which currently prevent the node from being built on > GCJ, while still having the ability to create SSL certificates for encrypted > HTTP/FCP/etc.
The code appears to be copied from sun.security.x509 (which is GPL, but shouldn't we give proper attribution?). Cheers, Michael
