On Thursday 05 June 2008 18:59:04 bbackde at googlemail.com wrote:
> My point (and I was misunderstood) was: if someone works on such a
> 'port' for freenet, it would be great if it would fit for all users, not
> only for the few who use Linux (*g*).
The platforms that are supported by Git are not really something I can do
about?
> But now I read that git fits well also for Windows users, so all is fine
> for me.
?but others seem to have taken care of that. Wonderful! :)
> Thats true. And it would be great if there would be at least one fully
> working solution, not a few half-working ones .... you have the chance to
> create one.
Daniel mentioned a thing on IRC that needs to be taken care of when the time
arrives: repositories of course grow over time. A repository might get big
enough that inserting it will become a pain in the ass; unfortunately, the
only kind of ?incremental update? that we could think of does have other
drawbacks, e.g. disappearing data. I?m not completely sure what to do about
that.
David
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080605/a3b919f6/attachment.pgp>
