* Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2008-05-17 14:44:27]:
> On Saturday 17 May 2008 13:58, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > * Florent Daigni?re <nextgens at freenetproject.org> [2008-05-17 14:03:10]: > > > > > * Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2008-05-17 12:29:09]: > > > > > > > As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he > > > > might > want > > > > to review this before I apply it. > > > > > > > > > > There is a related bug in the bug tracker... It's not the only bits that > > > need updating :/ > > > > > > See #74 > > > > http://download.intel.com/design/processor/applnots/24161832.pdf > > > http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers_and_tech_docs/25481.pdf > > > > Here are the CPUID codes if you want to update them. > > > So should we or shouldn't we apply yongjhen's patch? I think that applying that patch instead of updating the whole set of codes is not the way to go... If we were really after performances we would recompile the native libraries with the new libgmp... which has performances boost on that kind of (recent) processors. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080518/98e6b78a/attachment.pgp>
