On Wednesday 01 April 2009 16:05:43 Daniel Cheng wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Daniel Cheng <j16sdiz+freenet at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > I vote for git.
> 
> May I change my vote?
> I change to "abstain".
> 
>  * I am biased, because my work in jgit / git.
> 
>  * This should make some developer feel better.

You can change your vote, however I'm not sure I agree with your reasoning.
> 
> 
> > ?* I am maintaining a jgit (java port of git) over freenet transport.
> > ? ?And the upstream agreed (in principle) to merge it when ready.
> >
> > ?* Egit (git+eclipse integration) is preparing a proposal
> > ? to become a eclipse project.
> >
> > ?* Eclipse is having a debate on which SCM to use.
> > ? Everybody is talking about git, nobody care about hg.
> > ? ? ?https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=249745.
> > ? ? ?https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=197459
> > ? ? ?https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=257706
> >
> > In the community, you can see:
> > ? - Sun / Netbeans / OpenJDK / Java / Solaris camp is switching to hg.
> > ? - Eclipse / Apache / Ruby / Linux camp is going for git
> > ? - Ubuntu is going bzr (and nobody else care about them)
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090401/22865aef/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to