On Wednesday 01 April 2009 11:05:43 Daniel Cheng wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Daniel Cheng <j16sdiz+freenet at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > I vote for git.
> 
> May I change my vote?
> I change to "abstain".
> 
>  * I am biased, because my work in jgit / git.
> 
>  * This should make some developer feel better.

Actually this makes me feel worst.  With you working on jgit/git it means that
if we have a bug or need a feature added to git it will be easier to work thru
the process since we have someone that understands it.  From my pov this
is a big plus for git...

Ed

> >  * I am maintaining a jgit (java port of git) over freenet transport.
> >    And the upstream agreed (in principle) to merge it when ready.
> >
> >  * Egit (git+eclipse integration) is preparing a proposal
> >   to become a eclipse project.
> >
> >  * Eclipse is having a debate on which SCM to use.
> >   Everybody is talking about git, nobody care about hg.
> >      https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=249745.
> >      https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=197459
> >      https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=257706
> >
> > In the community, you can see:
> >   - Sun / Netbeans / OpenJDK / Java / Solaris camp is switching to hg.
> >   - Eclipse / Apache / Ruby / Linux camp is going for git
> >   - Ubuntu is going bzr (and nobody else care about them)
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
> 
> 

Reply via email to