On Friday 21 August 2009 18:18:51 xor wrote:
> On Friday 21 August 2009 19:16:15 xor wrote:
> > On Friday 21 August 2009 19:11:43 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > > 1231:
> > > - Increase the maximum peers limit and make it scale with your upstream
> > > bandwidth. 11 peers at 10KB/sec, 15 at 20KB/sec, 19 at 30KB/sec, 26 at
> > > 60KB/sec, 34 at 100KB/sec and 40 and 140KB/sec. Show the limit on the
> > > stats page.
> > > - When changing the store type (most notably when setting the store size
> > > in the first time wizard), don't stall for minutes or more preallocating
> > > the datastore - do it in the background. IMHO this was a serious problem
> > > for new users with a lot of disk space.
> >
> > Cool. I guess this should be published to the freenetproject.org news. And
> > you can mark that one as implemented:
> >
> > http://freenet.uservoice.com/pages/8861-general/suggestions/93039-release-
> > the-20-nodes-barrier?ref=titl
>
> Another idea: Maybe we should even brag about having implemented the #1
> request on uservoice - not only for the purpose of bragging but also for
> getting more attention on uservoice.
>
Done both.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090821/9c0f897e/attachment.pgp>