On Thursday 05 February 2009 13:52, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Thursday 05 February 2009 07:55, Daniel Cheng wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:10 PM, xor <xor at gmx.li> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: devl-bounces at freenetproject.org > > >> [mailto:devl-bounces at freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of Colin Davis > > >> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 7:50 AM > > >> To: Discussion of development issues > > >> Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Good news: WoT/Freetalk as my > > >> bachelor thesis > > >> > > >> I know that there have been various proposals from freenet > > >> message systems to work together; I would hope that this > > >> wouldn't encourage an even-more closed development process? > > >> > > > > > > I think I'll have to add one more thing: This will make > > > the development process more transparent because the > > > requirements for a bachelor thesis are like: > > > documentation, documentation, documentation. > > > > > > > make sure you have the right to release the code in GPL.. > > Some university have ridiculous "IP" policy. > > This is even more important because combining GPL and proprietary code leads > to a non-distributible result i.e. if the uni requires ownership of the code, > p0s will have to rewrite it all.
Doh, not thinking, he can license it to himself. But regardless, it won't be much use if it's closed source. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090205/9bcdb596/attachment.pgp>
