On Tuesday 13 January 2009 00:11, Zero3 wrote: > Matthew Toseland skrev: > > On Monday 12 January 2009 23:38, Zero3 wrote: > > > >> Screenshots: > >> http://privat.zero3.dk/FreenetInstaller_MainGUI.png > >> > > > > The disk space limits are probably a bit low. IIRC the minimum datastore size > > is 256MB... > > > > "a little amount" should be a "a small amount" > > > Wording fixed. > > The current calculations are: > Raw requirement: 100 MB datastore + 7 MB approx. size of other files > installed > Requirement with reserve: Raw requirement + 512 MB > > The reason I use 100 MB is that it's the last thing I heard. A fresh > test installs shows a datastore folder of 103 MB, so I guess it's > actually 100 MB + overhead?
The current autoconfig for datastore size has a minimum of 256MB. > > >> http://privat.zero3.dk/FreenetInstaller_JavaMissing.png > > > > "Freenet requires the Java Runtime Environment..." > > not "Freenet requires Java Runtime Environment..." > > Fixed. > > >> 5) Is the .fref file association a good idea at all? It's a bit messy, > >> and very hard to manage in environments with multiple installations or > >> nodes on another machine than the client. It seems like we are moving > >> towards friend codes/tokens in the future too, so is it really worth > >> keeping? Isn't the upload/paste reference features in fproxy good enough > >> for now? > > > > IMHO it is worthwhile ... why is it a problem? What happens when you click on > > one? It ought to be confirmed ... I don't think it is at the moment?? > > Problems: > 1) How do we know which node the user wants to load the reference into? > Do we search for all installed nodes and popup some kind of selection > GUI? Or do we pick the first/last (or arandom :P) installed node? IMHO the first node is fine. So is the last node. Most users won't have multiple nodes. > 2) If the node is installed on machine A, the client on machine B will > obviously not have the associations, unless he manually installs them. So what? > > It would also take some work to adapt the association to the new nounce > stuff, as the associations would have to be updated by the installer > when the URL nounce is turned on (how do we even do that?) - or we could > perhaps pass it through the launcher or something (atm. we seem to > execute a .jar that opens an URL directly. Maybe that one can be patched > instead?). I thought it used an FCP app? > > - Zero3 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090113/562a020f/attachment.pgp>
