On Wednesday 21 January 2009 05:05, bbackde at googlemail.com wrote: > Interesting, my friend still runs 1202 :) > > And no, I really did'nt kill the script. I will observe what happens > the next time and let you know.
1202 is actually the latest, it's just that 1202 hasn't been inserted yet. If the update script is broken, there is a problem ... if you're going to debug it then great. > > Thanks for your work. > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 02:55, Juiceman <juiceman69 at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 6:02 PM, <bbackde at googlemail.com> wrote: > >> I run 1201 and saw that a peer runs 1202. Started update.cmd, but it > >> left me with a 0-byte freenet.jar file :( > >> Even after I ran update.cmd several times it thought I have the latest > >> version... > >> > > > > 1201 is the latest. Did you kill the update script while it was > > running by any chance? > > I'm trying to make the script error-proof, but it doesn't help that my > > patches aren't getting committed :-( -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090121/a8c2e44b/attachment.pgp>
