On Thursday 21 May 2009 17:32:55 Juiceman wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Zero3 <zero3 at zerosplayground.dk> wrote: > > Matthew Toseland skrev: > >> On Sunday 17 May 2009 11:41:00 Zero3 wrote: > >>> Matthew Toseland skrev: > >>>>> Detecting the version of an installed application in the launcher (at > >>>>> least in Windows) shouldn't be a problem. It will most likely be > >>>>> registered in the registry next to the .exe path we are checking already > >>>>> for the individual browsers. We can also check the version info of .exes > >>>>> as an alternative (most Windows applications are compiled with various > >>>>> static info like version and author). The Windows launcher is already > >>>>> running Chrome with a command line argument making it start in privacy > >>>>> mode btw. > >>>> You should prioritise Chrome with privacy mode over Firefox without it. > >>> Agreed: https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=3118. > >> > >> I thought you had already done this? > > > > At time of writing, no. But since then I managed to figure git out and > > changed it (hence the bug is now "resolved"). > > > > ... which leads to another thing to consider: We need to make it > > possible to update the start.exe/stop.exe/freenetlauncher.exe files for > > existing users when new updates are made available. > > > > The easiest way to do this right now would probably be to add them to > > the update.cmd script. > > > > - Zero3 > > _______________________________________________ > > Devl mailing list > > Devl at freenetproject.org > > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > > > > I would be happy to do this, however I will need a defined directory > structure on the download site, with known file names. Like we have > the .url link for the freenet.jar. I believe I can use the .sha1 file > to check for updates if you want to have a static name. ie > wrapper_win32x86.exe etc. Also I would prefer to not have them inside > a zip unless we have have a built-in unzipping program in Windows I > can reliably call by command line. Otherwise we will have to bundle > yet another third party utility.
Well, they should be fetched from http[s]://checksums.freenetproject.org/latest/<filename>, not from downloads... are the relevant files currently available from checksums? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/24d8a49d/attachment.pgp>
