On Friday 15 May 2009 16:21:12 Zero3 wrote: > Matthew Toseland skrev: > > On Thursday 14 May 2009 18:40:31 Zero3 wrote: > >> Matthew Toseland skrev: > >>> Related idea: We should maybe tell the user in the installer that they > > should > >>> use a separate browser for Freenet, rather than in the wizard? And then > > let > >>> them choose one, and then use it when they click on the icon to browse > >>> Freenet? (#3104) > >> Most major browsers either have or are about to include "privacy mode" > >> which we ought to use instead. Maintaining 2 browser installations is a > >> hell for non-geeks as well. > > > > We would have to reliably detect it. Possible? > > Detecting the version of an installed application in the launcher (at > least in Windows) shouldn't be a problem. It will most likely be > registered in the registry next to the .exe path we are checking already > for the individual browsers. We can also check the version info of .exes > as an alternative (most Windows applications are compiled with various > static info like version and author). The Windows launcher is already > running Chrome with a command line argument making it start in privacy > mode btw.
You should prioritise Chrome with privacy mode over Firefox without it. > > I'm not entirely sure how the launch part is handled best on Linux (I'll > leave that to you Linux guys). -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090515/cabc42b9/attachment.pgp>
