Am Mittwoch 06 Mai 2009 00:23:54 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> Isn't using a reasonably low scheduling priority enough? And we already do
> that!
Not really, since I can't disable it (when I want full speed), and it sadly
doesn't work really well for memory consumption.
I'd like an option to have freenet go inactive as soon as the system load gets
too high. It will lose connections anyway (low scheduling priority leads to
far too high answer-times), so it could just explicitely take a break until my
system runs well again.
But I don't want to have that all the time. When I compile something in the
background, I want freenet to take predecence (that's already well covered
with the low scheduling priority, though).
Best wishes,
Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
- singing a part of the history of free software -
http://infinite-hands.draketo.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090510/3b74fc83/attachment.pgp>
