-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Are all the changes made to update.cmd compatible with the java-based > installer? For example, juiceman removed a bunch of commands relating to > start.cmd; certainly I haven't tested my changes with the java-based > installer. I've always coded it assuming it would be used for both installers, so unless there is a bug, yes. =) I would prefer that there is only one update.cmd on the website. > > Also, do we want to get rid of Windows support from the java-based installer? > The website always shows the exe for windows users now... Hmm. The new installer is nice... Have we received any reports of it not working? I don't see any reason to remove support unnecessarily... It is not much work to copy updates to both branches. > > Oh, and you didn't write version 3.0 - at least not all of it. :) I'll just change it to read "contributions by Juiceman" on next commit. =) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Use GnuPG with Firefox : http://getfiregpg.org (Version: 0.7.5) iEYEARECAAYFAkoWAZAACgkQ4esu1mlKOs8g5QCfS3h76lE+dBmZLeLTp30ArgRR I+gAnjYsuPWByBr9atZO6K4+rBjxt0l1 =Rsmn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
