On Saturday, 23. May 2009 16:06:51 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> People will game the system, no? If they think paedophiles are scum who
> should not be allowed to speak, and they realise that clicking "This is
> spam" is more effective than "This is crap", they will click the former,
> no?
Not if the penalty for marking something falsely as spam is to lose all trust
for their own messages ("You falsely reported spam -> you're a spammer") while
the "penalty" for thinking different is simply that their ratings won't be
taken as seriously.
(I hope the above is possible in the implementation).
Best wishes,
Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
- singing a part of the history of free software -
http://infinite-hands.draketo.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090523/aa156094/attachment.pgp>
