On Saturday 23 May 2009 21:11:59 Evan Daniel wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Matthew Toseland
>
> <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote:
> > On Saturday 23 May 2009 10:43:09 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> >> On Friday, 22. May 2009 23:10:42 Mike Bush wrote:
> >> > I have been watching this debate an I was wondering whether it could
> >> > help to have 2 sets of trust values for each identity in a trust list,
> >> > this could mean you could mark an identity as spamming or that I don't
> >> > want to see these posts again as i find them objectionable.
> >>
> >> This is what Credence did in the end for spam detection on Gnutella, so
> >> it might fit the human psyche :)
> >>
> >> People got the option to say "that's bad quality or misleading", "I
> >> don't like it" or "that's spam".
> >>
> >> For messages that could be
> >>
> >> * "that ID posts spam"
> >> * "that ID posts crap"
> >>
> >> The first can easily be reviewed, the second is subjective. That would
> >> give a soft group censorship option, but give the useful spam detection
> >> to everyone.
> >>
> >> Best wishes,
> >> Arne
> >>
> >> PS: Yes, I mostly just tried to clarify Mikes post for me. I hope the
> >> mail's useful to you nontheless.
> >
> > People will game the system, no? If they think paedophiles are scum who
> > should not be allowed to speak, and they realise that clicking "This is
> > spam" is more effective than "This is crap", they will click the former,
> > no?
>
> I would assume that's the normal case.  OTOH, there isn't much harm in
> implementing it, and if some people use it, that would help
> somewhat...  Perhaps implement, but not required for initial release?

Multiple trust lists are in fact planned, and in fact not planned for the next 
release: https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=3067

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090526/b4c1365f/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to