On Saturday 31 October 2009 11:13:35 Ed Tomlinson wrote: > Some data for you. Months ago I enlarged by store from 16G to 32G. My CHK > Store is now using 8.35G, the CHK cache uses 14.9G (its full). This implies > that we add to the cache at a very slow rate. I would be templed to simulate > random routing AND decreasing the HTL such that it starts caching eariler (eg > decrease the threshold by more than the number of hops randomly routed). >
In the few days since 1239 went live my store has reached 9.12G and the cache has remained constant. One interesting thing to note. The write rates seem a bit strange. Writes 12,466 1,182 Access Rate 2.67 /s 2.36 /s Write Rate 0.12 /s 0.01 /s The store write rate has jumped and the cache rate fallen. This seems a little strange? Should not we always be caching more than storing? Thanks Ed
