On Tuesday 07 December 2010 17:21:07 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Friday 03 December 2010 19:15:22 Klaus Koch wrote:
> > > > It is a hard problem. But our traditional approach hasn't been terribly
> > > > honest IMHO.
> > 
> > We were talking on #freenet on how to explain new users in a few words 
> > (installer?) what freenet's security is all about and how to "warn" them of 
> > the shortcomings of opennet. I came up with the following text:
> > 
> > "Freenet's security and anonymity is based on the idea that users connect to
> > people they trust. Opennet mode (=LOW security level) is a convenience 
> > feature
> > for new users who don't have trusted peers yet and it's security is not as 
> > strong as darknet (= MEDIUM/HIGH security level). Use this mode to befriend 
> > people you think you can trust. Get the highest security out of freenet by 
> > connection to your reallife friends!"
> > 
> > somehow there's still missing that even connecting to a coworker is better 
> > than a random stranger, but I still struggle to put it into one of the 
> > sentences...
> 
> IMHO that is precisely what people misunderstand most frequently. How about:
> 
> Generally on Freenet you are only vulnerable to the users your node is 
> connected to. 
> Do you want Freenet to connect only to your friends? 
> 
> YES (DARKNET MODE):
> If you have 5 or more friends who run Freenet, you should enable darknet 
> mode, and add them on the Friends page. Freenet will send your traffic 
> through them to their friends and the rest of the network. This greatly 
> improves your security, because you choose who you connect to. You should 
> only add people you know personally, online or offline.
> 
> NO (OPENNET MODE):
> Freenet can connect to other users automatically, if you don't know anyone on 
> Freenet. However, this is a convenience feature offering only minimal 
> security against a determined attacker. In opennet mode, the bad guys can 
> choose to connect to you, whereas in darknet mode, you choose who you connect 
> to.
> 
Ian suggested creating an ietherpad page for the wording so we can collaborate. 
Please have a look:
http://ietherpad.com/qq8WQKFr7o
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20101217/f32cb04f/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to