On Saturday 13 February 2010 15:27:14 Ian Clarke wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Thomas Sachau <mail at tommyserver.de> wrote: > > > > I don't accept that, but I *do* support using GWT. GWT is a good means > > to generate cross platform Javascript code. > > > > I disagree with both of you. GWT is a mess, when you want to compile it > > yourself without binary and precompiled inclusions. So until you can present > > me a clean way to create a GWT copy from source, i strongly vote against it, > > this would make packagers work *much* harder. > > Why would you want to compile GWT yourself? Do you compile javac yourself > before you use it? Do you compile Eclipse? > > > In addition, also GWT creates javascript code, what about those users, who > > dont have or want to use javascript? > > Those users are welcome to create a lynx friendly version of FProxy for > themselves, we need to focus on the majority of users who are happy to use > javascript.
Isn't there a legal requirement that websites be accessible via lynx under disability discrimination law in many countries including the UK and possibly the US? Of course this only means there is yet another reason why running a public Freenet node would be iffy... but it's probably a good thing in terms of advertising ... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100213/2c4b51ad/attachment.pgp>
