On Wednesday 20 October 2010 10:46:01 Volodya wrote: > > Because I know that this email will not have any effect probably I suggest > > we > > change our policy for releasing new versions (version as in 0.7.5, 0.8, > > etc.) > > to: > > > > ============================================ > > 1. ALL issues with the given target version in the bugtracker must be > > resolved, closed or assigned a different target version. NO release with a > > single open issues in the roadmap page (= with the given target version). > > 2. NO release if there are any issues with block/crash severity and no > > target > > version. They must be assigned a target version first, which will cause > > rule 1 > > to hit maybe. > > ============================================ > > While i can sypathise with what you are saying, i'd like to point out that > this > is not the best policy, mainly because that would automatically collapse > freenet > into 2/2/0.5 rule. Look at the way more and more software is being developped > today in an agile world, what is stationary *is* the date, and it's the > features > that are changed.
What's the 2/2/0.5 rule? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20101021/edd875a9/attachment.pgp>
