I second this. I'm more than willing to help out, but could you give us some more information about the particular demands a seednode has to live up to?
On Jan 3, 2011, at 12:52 PM, Bill Ritchie wrote: > I've been lurking for some time and I'm looking for a good way to contribute. > If running a seed node helps then I'm all for it > > I currently have several machines running freenet of which I would be happy > to use as a seednode. My question is, what makes a good seednode? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: devl-bounces at freenetproject.org [mailto:devl-bounces at > freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Toseland > Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 1:05 PM > To: devl at freenetproject.org; support at freenetproject.org > Subject: [freenet-dev] Seednodes: Removing me and need more! > > I have removed my node from the seednodes list as of the next build because > being a seednode makes it very difficult to debug timeout bugs. However, we > only have 8 seednodes at the moment. Please email me your opennet noderef > (from the Strangers page in advanced mode) if you can be a seednode. Thanks! > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
