On Friday 02 Sep 2011 18:20:02 Ian Clarke wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Matthew Toseland <toad at > amphibian.dyndns.org > > wrote: > > > WE NEED MORE DATA. > > > > Well, my gut tells me that our existing scheme is likely too complicated to > fix unless we are extremely fortuitous, however I'm happy to be wrong about > that if others think that they have a good understanding of why we're having > problems and how to fix them.
And my gut tells me that scrapping 6 months work sucks, especially when the current performance appears to be well below what it was when I started to deploy NLM, so we should try to salvage it, especially as anything new will probably take another 6 months to argue about, design, simulate, tweak and generally get right. Funny how gut feelings can be so subjective! ;) > > So this is fine with me provided that its not just data for data's sake, but > *actionable* data. By this I mean that the data we collect should give us > clear information about what is and isn't working, and hopefully tell us how > to fix it. > > But a bunch of metrics we have no idea how to interpret won't get us > anywhere. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110902/216bffee/attachment.pgp>
