Am Freitag, 2. September 2011, 23:34:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > If the load balancer does not have some hidden delicacies, there is a > > very simple check to see if my understanding is right. > > > > Since SSKs are mostly unsuccessfull and are about 50% of the requests, > > the bandwidth limiter essentially targets 50% of the bandwidth. > > No, it takes into account that SSKs use very little bandwidth (1-2K versus > 32K).
That might explain the data I see: Bandwidth: 75 down, 85 up. I expected 90 kB/s. Theory: My claimed bandwidth doubling seems to have overshot, which gave too many timeouts (that is also supported by the volatility of the bandwidth: oszillating rapidly between 50 and 100 - this is with AIMDs on). Best wishes, Arne -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 316 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110903/3c5f1eab/attachment.pgp>
