On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Evan Daniel <evanbd at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm in favor of https only. The only real arguments against it are > probably server cpu load. I assume that given our traffic levels, > that's not likely to be an issue? Actually it might. While we normally hover around 2,500 visits per day, which the server should be able to handle quite easily, we do occasionally get linked from high-traffic websites which puts a lot more strain on the server. It's important that the server doesn't go down on these occasions as they are an important way to acquire new users, donors, and developers. Ian. -- Ian Clarke Founder, The Freenet Project Email: ian at freenetproject.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120314/a5bcdf27/attachment.html>
