> > On Aug 18, 2008, at 5:54 PM, Ludovic Dubost wrote: > >> >> +1 >> >> I think currently we can only use the new wysiwyg if we have a page >> using XWiki 2.0 syntax right ? > > yes.
The new WYSIWYG is not bound to the XWiki 2.0 syntax. I have a XHTMLConverter component with two implementations at this time: one (fully working) using Vincent's new rendering module and one (needing some adjustments) using the old Radeox engine. I could detect the page syntax and lookup the right implementation, but is it worth doing? If not, how should I react when the new WYSIWYG is forced on a page with the old syntax? Thanks, Marius > > -Vincent > >> Jerome Velociter wrote: >>> +1. I've seen the new WYSIWYG in action and think it would be >>> great/beneficial to have it experimental in 1.6M1. >>> What about a parameter in xwiki.cfg to have it always available in >>> the >>> "editors" panel, like "New WYSIWYG [experimental]" ? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Jerome. >>> >>> >>>> Hi devs, >>>> >>>> I propose to move the new WYSIWYG editor into the platform in >>>> order to >>>> have it as an experimental feature for 1.6M1. >>>> >>>> The following steps should be taken: >>>> * Create a platform/web/wysiwyg module to host the code currently >>>> resided >>>> in sandbox/wysiwyg >>>> * Change templates/edit.vm, templates/editpanels.vm and create >>>> templates/editwysiwygnew.vm to make XE aware of the new editor. >>>> This way >>>> our users will be able to experiment the new WYSIWYG editor on any >>>> page, >>>> by having editor=wysiwygnew in the edit URL. >>>> * Change platform/web/pom/xml and enterprise/web/pom.xml >>>> >>>> Here's my +1 >>>> Marius > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
