+1 for making the new editor only available with the new rendering & the new syntax. We've already spent a long time coping with Radeox-related issues - let's end it as fast as we can :-)
Guillaume On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Vincent Massol wrote: > >> On Aug 18, 2008, at 8:18 PM, Vincent Massol wrote: > >> > >> > >>> On Aug 18, 2008, at 8:03 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>> On Aug 18, 2008, at 5:54 PM, Ludovic Dubost wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> +1 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I think currently we can only use the new wysiwyg if we have a page > >>>>>> using XWiki 2.0 syntax right ? > >>>>>> > >>>>> yes. > >>>>> > >>>> The new WYSIWYG is not bound to the XWiki 2.0 syntax. I have a > >>>> XHTMLConverter component with two implementations at this time: one > >>>> (fully > >>>> working) using Vincent's new rendering module and one (needing some > >>>> adjustments) using the old Radeox engine. I could detect the page > >>>> syntax > >>>> and lookup the right implementation, but is it worth doing? If not, > >>>> how > >>>> should I react when the new WYSIWYG is forced on a page with the old > >>>> syntax? > >>>> > >>> I have a question: if we use radeox is the new editor going to be > >>> better than the old one? > > AFAIK, many of the current WYSIWYG's issues are in fact Radeox issues. > Plus, the new editor has less features at this point, so I don't think > it's going to be better with Radeox. I too think the new WYSIWYG and the > new rendering should go hand in hand. > > >>> > >>> I think it's not worth doing it. When the old syntax is used there > >>> shouldn't be any way to edit the page using the new WYSIWYG editor > >>> IMO. That will also provide another incentive to move to the new > >>> syntax. > >>> > > ok for me if we have a button "convert to XWiki 2.0" > > > >> > >> BTW we have the question for the office converter. It's converting > >> HTML to wiki syntax using the new rendering and thus we get new syntax > >> only. > >> > >> We really need to decide what we want. Any comment on my previous email? > >> > >> Thanks > >> -Vincent > >> > >> > >>> However moving to the new syntax is not something so we'll need to > >>> make it as painless as possible. > >>> > >>> > > Yes I think we need a button when a page is in xwiki syntax 1.0 to do > > "convert to XWiki 2.0 syntax" > >>> I think this new wysiwyg + the new rendering may warrant us calling > >>> this XWiki 2.0 when we activate them and make them the default. We > >>> could release 1.6 with these as options only that can enabled in the > >>> configuration. Then release a 2.0 with them enabled by default and > >>> with the old ones as configurable. > >>> > >>> > > I agree +1 > > > >>> WDYT? > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> -Vincent > >>> > >>> > >>>>>> Jerome Velociter wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> +1. I've seen the new WYSIWYG in action and think it would be > >>>>>>> great/beneficial to have it experimental in 1.6M1. > >>>>>>> What about a parameter in xwiki.cfg to have it always available in > >>>>>>> the > >>>>>>> "editors" panel, like "New WYSIWYG [experimental]" ? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>> Jerome. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi devs, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I propose to move the new WYSIWYG editor into the platform in > >>>>>>>> order to > >>>>>>>> have it as an experimental feature for 1.6M1. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The following steps should be taken: > >>>>>>>> * Create a platform/web/wysiwyg module to host the code currently > >>>>>>>> resided > >>>>>>>> in sandbox/wysiwyg > >>>>>>>> * Change templates/edit.vm, templates/editpanels.vm and create > >>>>>>>> templates/editwysiwygnew.vm to make XE aware of the new editor. > >>>>>>>> This way > >>>>>>>> our users will be able to experiment the new WYSIWYG editor on > >>>>>>>> any > >>>>>>>> page, > >>>>>>>> by having editor=wysiwygnew in the edit URL. > >>>>>>>> * Change platform/web/pom/xml and enterprise/web/pom.xml > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Here's my +1 > >>>>>>>> Marius > >>>>>>>> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> devs mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Ludovic Dubost > > Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/ > > XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com > > Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost > > > > _______________________________________________ > > devs mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > > > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Guillaume Lerouge Product Manager - XWiki Skype ID : wikibc http://blog.xwiki.com/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
