And, well, at least I know (or maybe I only think I know?) that this impacts Caleb's ability to deliver the new invitation application thus it's (hopefully) not like I don't know anything about it...
Fingers crossed. Guillaume On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Guillaume Lerouge <[email protected]>wrote: > +1 (for formal validation only - though that maybe infringes on my "don't > vote on stuff I don't get" rule). > > Please hold on Caleb's withdrawal offer if needed. > > Guillaume > > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Caleb James DeLisle < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I was informed that this vote needs 3 +1 to be valid so although the >> change is committed >> anyone who does not like this change please send a -1 before Thursday and >> I will remove the >> change pending further discussion. >> >> Caleb >> >> Caleb James DeLisle wrote: >> > When this was a proposal I got +1 from Sergiu so I understand that is a >> vote. >> > 2 +1 >> > 1 +0 >> > 0 -1 >> > >> > I'm going to go ahead and commit this now. >> > >> > Caleb >> > >> > >> > Caleb James DeLisle wrote: >> >> Here is a patch which adds those methods >> >> >> http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/secure/attachment/16923/XWIKI-5041-allowDocumentModificationInAuthorsContext.patch >> >> And the issue: >> >> http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-5041 >> >> >> >> Caleb James DeLisle wrote: >> >>> Hello all, >> >>> I'd like to make this change: >> >>> >> >>> Add to xwiki.api.Document >> >>> saveAsAuthor() >> >>> saveAsAuthor(String comment) >> >>> saveAsAuthor(String connent, String isMinorEdit) >> >>> deleteAsAuthor() >> >>> >> >>> Add to xwiki.api.XWiki >> >>> getDocumentAsAuthor(DocumentReference reference) >> >>> getDocumentAsAuthor(String fullName) >> >>> >> >>> They save, load or delete the document if the script's contentAuthor >> has the necessary permission, the user in >> >>> context is switched so the contentAuthor is listed as having done the >> operation. >> >>> >> >>> Though they say *AsAuthor the action will take place in the name of >> the contentAuthor of the document >> >>> this is mainly because *AsContentAuthor is long and confusing. >> >>> >> >>> This is already partially available if the script has programming >> access but I think it is an important >> >>> enough feature that it should not be limited to scripts with >> programming access. >> >>> Use case: allowing users to submit information without letting them >> see or modify what other users had submitted. >> >>> >> >>> This is my +1 >> >>> >> >>> Caleb >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> devs mailing list >> >>> [email protected] >> >>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> devs mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> >> >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > devs mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> > > > > -- > Guillaume Lerouge > Product Manager - XWiki SAS > Skype: wikibc > Twitter: glerouge > http://guillaumelerouge.com/ > -- Guillaume Lerouge Product Manager - XWiki SAS Skype: wikibc Twitter: glerouge http://guillaumelerouge.com/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
