I'd hate to include patched binaries in the project because that makes
it completely unmaintainable to the next person, right now it builds
each of it's needed elements so the work could theoretically be picked
right back up where it stopped.

I suppose I could ship a big-ugly-patch and include a patch step in the
shell script but I won't have time to run this through all of the tests
so this will be a bit of a Hail Mary change..

Thanks,
Caleb

On 11/05/2013 11:26 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Caleb James DeLisle 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
>> Hi guys,
>> It's been a while since this demo was created but I was looking at
>> my github and it has not been touched so I would like to document it
>> and put it in contrib where it's available.
>>
>> I have a question about technique, this demo builds on the standard
>> version of xwiki-platform but requires a special version of
>> xwiki-enterprise.
>> Is it ok to have a long term branch in the xwiki-enterprise repository or
>> should the entire repository be copied into contrib?
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
> 
> hmm, why don't you depend on binaries instead in your build?
> 
> This is what I did for some project and it worked well.
> 
> Thanks
> -Vincent
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> 
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to