On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Thomas Mortagne <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > It would be really nice to get some more feedback on this, since we
>> need it
>> > for 7.3M2 (to fix the failing tests).
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Eduard
>> >
>> > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> +1 for extracting it. We currently need this in the administration
>> module,
>> >> for the template provider UI.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> IMO, xwiki-platform-tree is basically about the tree widget... almost
>> >> nothing to do with XWiki's data model. In my eyes, this looks like the
>> >> technology, not the domain.
>> >>
>> >> xwiki-platform-index makes much more sense to me, since it defines the
>> >> domain, which can present an index of documents using various
>> technologies:
>> >> livetable (documents), tree (documentTree), intepretive dance, etc.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> +1 for proposal 2 (since we agreed that we were grouping modules by
>> domain
>> >> and not by technology).
>>
>> My preference goes to proposal 2 with the same feeling already exposed by
>> Edy.
>>
>
> +1
>

Renaming the current 3 modules in xwiki-platform-tree in
xwiki-platform-tree-generic-* doesn't sound right: "generic" feels
redundant in the name. I don't have a better proposal than 2.


>
> Thanks,
> Marius
>
>
>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >>
>> >> Eduard
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> P.S.: We could also extract an xwiki-platform-index-livetable (or
>> >> something with -macro-document if we want to make it about the name of
>> the
>> >> macro instead of the presentation technology) for the Documents macro
>> >> (XWiki.DocumentsMacro), currently also bundled in index-ui.
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:25 PM, [email protected] <
>> [email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi devs,
>> >>>
>> >>> I see that the DocumentTree macro is used more and more in several
>> places
>> >>> (as it should) and I’d like to propose to extract the DocumentTree
>> macro
>> >>> from the Index App.
>> >>>
>> >>> Proposal 1:
>> >>> ===========
>> >>>
>> >>> xwiki-platform-tree
>> >>>   |_ xwiki-platform-tree-generic
>> >>>     |_ ...
>> >>>   |_ xwiki-platform-tree-document
>> >>>     |_ ...
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Proposal 2:
>> >>> ===========
>> >>>
>> >>> xwiki-platform-index
>> >>>   |_ xwiki-platform-index-ui
>> >>>   |_ xwiki-plarform-index-tree
>> >>>     |_ …
>> >>>
>> >>> WDYT? Any other proposal?
>> >>>
>> >>> Personally I prefer proposal 1.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks
>> >>> -Vincent
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> devs mailing list
>> >>> [email protected]
>> >>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > devs mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thomas Mortagne
>> _______________________________________________
>> devs mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to