+1 for proposal 2, convinced by the Edy's arguments. 2015-10-27 7:26 GMT+01:00 Marius Dumitru Florea < [email protected]>:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Thomas Mortagne < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > It would be really nice to get some more feedback on this, since we > >> need it > >> > for 7.3M2 (to fix the failing tests). > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Eduard > >> > > >> > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> +1 for extracting it. We currently need this in the administration > >> module, > >> >> for the template provider UI. > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> IMO, xwiki-platform-tree is basically about the tree widget... almost > >> >> nothing to do with XWiki's data model. In my eyes, this looks like > the > >> >> technology, not the domain. > >> >> > >> >> xwiki-platform-index makes much more sense to me, since it defines > the > >> >> domain, which can present an index of documents using various > >> technologies: > >> >> livetable (documents), tree (documentTree), intepretive dance, etc. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> +1 for proposal 2 (since we agreed that we were grouping modules by > >> domain > >> >> and not by technology). > >> > >> My preference goes to proposal 2 with the same feeling already exposed > by > >> Edy. > >> > > > > +1 > > > > Renaming the current 3 modules in xwiki-platform-tree in > xwiki-platform-tree-generic-* doesn't sound right: "generic" feels > redundant in the name. I don't have a better proposal than 2. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Marius > > > > > >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> > >> >> Eduard > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> P.S.: We could also extract an xwiki-platform-index-livetable (or > >> >> something with -macro-document if we want to make it about the name > of > >> the > >> >> macro instead of the presentation technology) for the Documents macro > >> >> (XWiki.DocumentsMacro), currently also bundled in index-ui. > >> >> > >> >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:25 PM, [email protected] < > >> [email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Hi devs, > >> >>> > >> >>> I see that the DocumentTree macro is used more and more in several > >> places > >> >>> (as it should) and I’d like to propose to extract the DocumentTree > >> macro > >> >>> from the Index App. > >> >>> > >> >>> Proposal 1: > >> >>> =========== > >> >>> > >> >>> xwiki-platform-tree > >> >>> |_ xwiki-platform-tree-generic > >> >>> |_ ... > >> >>> |_ xwiki-platform-tree-document > >> >>> |_ ... > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> Proposal 2: > >> >>> =========== > >> >>> > >> >>> xwiki-platform-index > >> >>> |_ xwiki-platform-index-ui > >> >>> |_ xwiki-plarform-index-tree > >> >>> |_ … > >> >>> > >> >>> WDYT? Any other proposal? > >> >>> > >> >>> Personally I prefer proposal 1. > >> >>> > >> >>> Thanks > >> >>> -Vincent > >> >>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>> devs mailing list > >> >>> [email protected] > >> >>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > devs mailing list > >> > [email protected] > >> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Thomas Mortagne > >> _______________________________________________ > >> devs mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Guillaume Delhumeau ([email protected]) Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS Committer on the XWiki.org project _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
