+1 On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi devs, > > I’m transforming the brainstorming that was started in the thread > http://markmail.org/message/exlndbq3tw2thmmu into a VOTE mail since this > is a very important decision. > > So I’m asking you to vote for defining a new direction for the XWiki Core > Dev Team (i.e. for the XWiki GitHub Organization). The need was triggered > by the Tour and CKEditor extensions which are currently in xwiki-contrib > and that we want our users to have by default. For more details see this > thread: http://markmail.org/message/exlndbq3tw2thmmu > > So here’s the strategy: > > * Make XWiki Github org == minimal runtime, where minimal means “basic > wiki” (page edition, history, linking, wiki markup, etc). The notion of > “basic wiki” would need to be better defined but this can be done later on. > * Provide a "Base Flavor" which corresponds to this “basic wiki”, as part > of xwiki-platform (this would be xwiki-platform-distribution). > * Provide another flavor, the "Default Flavor” which would add some > hand-picked third-party extensions (i.e. from contrib) such as the Tour app > and CKEditor (to start with, we could also add the markdown syntax for > example which is one of the most asked syntaxes). Note that this Default > Flavor would actually be a “replacement" of xwiki-enterprise. > > * The Default Flavor would have at least the same release cycle as the > base flavor but it could have more releases (if some of the bundled > third-party extensions has some important bug fixes or new features that we > want to offer quickly without waiting for the next base flavor release). > I don't think we need to release the Default Flavor more often than the Base Flavor because with this new strategy the users can upgrade individual extensions (those that are not in the Base Flavor) without upgrading the WAR. Currently the users cannot upgrade the Blog because the new version of the Blog depends on a new version of the XWiki WAR. With this new strategy the users will be able to upgrade the Blog (considering that the Blog is not part of the Base Flavor). On the same topic, we have the Extension Updater administration section where users can check for extension updates. The problem is that the extensions included in a flavor are considered dependencies of the flavor and thus are installed as dependencies which means the Extension Updater cannot separate them from other technical dependencies and thus won't check for their updates. Ideally a flavor should be a pack of extensions that are installed explicitly (not as dependencies). This way the Extension Updater can propose updates and at the same time the users can uninstall extensions from a flavor without removing the flavor. Thanks, Marius > * The consequence is that the XWiki Dev Team would need to be a bit more > careful to monitor the quality of bundled third-party extensions in contrib > (check commits, do some smoke testing, etc). Note that the goal of the > Default flavor would not be to offer verticals (for this there should be > some contrib flavors) and thus it wouldn’t bundle a lot of third-party > extensions. Basically we’ll need to validate the version of those > third-party extensions that include in the flavor. > > My POV is that globally this would offer more flexibility for our users > (they’ll be able to install extensions such as CK and Tour in older XWiki > versions and they’ll get more frequent releases) at the cost of some > overhead to develop extensions that work in several versions. The dev team > is pretty small and thus it means developing a bit less fast but it’s > probably as important, if not more important, to make the code we develop > available in older xwiki versions, as XWiki gains traction. > > Here’s my +1 > > Please cast your vote. > > Thanks > -Vincent > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
