Hi,

> On 14 Apr 2017, at 15:51, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Here is a new proposal on this subject.
> 
> This supersets the following threads:
> * http://markmail.org/message/mhhurc7lbyfanph7
> * http://markmail.org/message/nav5a77hzmhq4gq6
> * http://markmail.org/message/fd5ijxdquzdhtykw
> 
> We discussed with other committers (Vincent and Ludovic) and came to
> the conclusion that it was not core dev team job to provide a specific
> flavor like Knowledge Base and that we should focus only on a very
> generic one (pretty much XE without the Blog).
> 
> Here are the details:
> 
> = One flavor
> 
> We develop only 1 flavor located in xwiki-platform repository. It's a
> generic flavor not targeting any specific use case (the first version
> with be XE without the Blog). We will discuss the name in another
> thread later, let's call it "Wiki Flavor" for now.
> 
> Of course everyone is free and welcomed to build lots of contrib
> flavors which will be proposed when you install XWiki ("Development
> Flavor", "Demo Flavor", "Blog Flavor", etc.).
> 
> = No "Base flavor"
> 
> But platform will provide an extension that can be used as dependency
> by various flavors to get "core" UI extensions that we think make
> sense in any kind of flavor.
> 
> = Demo package
> 
> We currently have a jetty/hsqldb based package in platform which let
> you choose which flavor you want. We will show it in the download
> page.
> 
> We will add another one with the Wiki Flavor already installed in it
> (pretty much like the XE jetty/hsqldb package). Listed on the download
> page too.
> 
> We don't maintain exe/jar installers anymore in platform, they die
> with XWiki Enterprise. They are a real pain to maintain and we are
> actually failing since they don't really work properly everywhere they
> are supposed to work. It does not worth the trouble for what is not a
> production ready package and it's better anyway to make more clear
> XWiki is a server thing.
> 
> WDYT ?

Fine with me obviously (since we discussed it together :)).

Thanks
-Vincent

> Thanks,
> -- 
> Thomas Mortagne

Reply via email to