> On 6 Jun 2018, at 13:17, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> On 6 Jun 2018, at 12:07, Алексей Овсянников <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello everybody!
>> 
>> We are stuck for the release of "Android Authenticator" application.
>> 
>> You need 2 things to publish on play store:
>> 
>>  - A unique application ID (the current one is
>>  "org.xwiki.android.authenticator")
>>  - An associated publication key
>> 
>> Problem is that we lost the key (we lost contact with Fitz during first
>> GSOC before he get a change to give us the private key he used for the
>> first release) and you can't change the key for an application on play
>> store. We contacted the support to know if we could modify the key but we
>> did not get any answer
> 
> Actually we got an answer. I saw a mail in the [email protected] 
> moderation queue this morning but unfortunately I deleted it.
> 
> If you can ask again, I can let the email go through or forward it to you.

Note that the email we got was a generated email (not a hand written one).

I remember there was a link in it.

Thanks
-Vincent

> 
> Thanks
> -Vincent
> 
>> and since it' not too critical to ditch the old
>> (beta released only) application and create a new one (new from play store
>> point of view) we decided to change the id.
>> 
>> Also note that the Java package we use in the module is
>> "org.xwiki.android.authenticator" which is why we have the current
>> application id.
>> 
>> Here are a few proposals:
>> 1) "org.xwiki.android.authenticator.v2" as in the second version of the key
>> and if we loose the key again it can be v3 :)
>> 
>> 2) "org.xwiki.android.authenticator.i2" to not look to much like a version
>> of the application (id 2)
>> 
>> 3) "org.xwiki.android.sync" since the application is about synchronization
>> of xwiki data
>> 
>> 4) "org.xwiki.android.sync.contacts" since the application is about
>> synchronization of contacts too
>> 
>> 5) "org.xwiki.android.authenticator.reborn" as in it's been a long time
>> since we did a release of this application and half of it has been
>> rewritten since that time
>> 
>> WDYT ?
>> 
>> I think that "*.(v2|reborn)" are not better ways to rename (but
>> "reborn" better than "v2" becase "v2" mean version number 2, but what for
>> do we have android app version?:) ) and in my humble opinion we must choose
>> "org.xwiki.android.sync.contacts" or better to choose
>> "org.xwiki.android.sync" because it will not prohibit us to add extension
>> applications with packages as "org.xwiki.android.sync.contacts" and will
>> show first value and purpose of application.
>> 
>> Issue: https://jira.xwiki.org/browse/ANDAUTH-35
>> ---------
>> Best regards,
>> Ovsyannikov Aleksey,
>> [email protected]

Reply via email to