> On 6 Jun 2018, at 13:24, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 6 Jun 2018, at 12:37, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> +1 for A-2, since I find it more consistent and logical for an element that
>> accepts inner content to indent that content, once it spans on multiple
>> lines (since you can also have the inline version). It would be consistent
>> with the indentation policy we apply for HTML as well.
>> 
>> I can't find many arguments for making an exception for them, other than
>> the fact that the velocity and HTML macros tend to be used quite loosely
>> (i.e. pages with entire content wrapped by a start and end velocity macro),
>> but we are talking generally about all rendering macros, so I think it
>> makes sense to indent. The SyntaxHighlighting enabled wiki editor also
>> helps in indenting multiple lines at the same time.
>> 
>> Note: One thing that I remember that needs fixing in the SH enabled editor
>> is the "decrease indentation" operation (i.e. SHIFT+TAB should decrease the
>> indentation of the selected lines by one level) which is now configured to
>> do "auto-indentation" instead (i.e. indent the lines to the level dictated
>> by the context, a bit similar to the "Auto-Formatting" option in Eclipse,
>> or other IDEs). However, I don't remember hearing many people complain
>> about this yet, so maybe it's not that painful, but would still need fixing.
> 
> Well on my side I curse the syntax highlighting almost every single day… :(
> 
> Honestly, right now, I would very much prefer to just disable it by default.

Before someone says I can disable it, I use new xwiki instances every day. 

And on shared instances, I don’t think you can turn it off just for your user 
ATM.

Thanks
-Vincent

> 
> I do lots of testing every day, using velocity and groovy macros and the 
> indentation costs me way too much time than it should, especially for macro 
> closing. In my use cases the coloring is a nice to have but it’s not really 
> needed (I only have a few lines) but the extra keystrokes needed for 
> unindenting are a pain.
> 
> Thanks
> -Vincent
> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Eduard
>> 
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I'm OK with both but I prefer A-2 which is more readable and more logical
>>> IMO.
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Context 1: https://jira.xwiki.org/browse/WIKIEDITOR-58
>>>> Context 2: Fill the “velocity code style” section of
>>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/CodeStyle/
>>>> 
>>>> Option A-1: No top level indentation
>>>> =========================
>>>> 
>>>> {{velocity}}
>>>> #set ($var = …)
>>>> #if (…)
>>>> …
>>>> #if (…)
>>>> #end
>>>> #end
>>>> {{/velocity}}
>>>> 
>>>> Nested example:
>>>> 
>>>> {{velocity}}
>>>> #if ($doc.fullName != 'XWiki.AdminInlineSheet')
>>>> #set($formname = 'inline')
>>>> #set($saveaction = 'save')
>>>> #set($previewenabled = true)
>>>> #set($xnotification = $!request.getParameter('xnotification'))
>>>> {{html}}
>>>> <form id="inline" method="post" action="$doc.getURL('preview’)">
>>>>   <div>
>>>>   …
>>>> {{/velocity}}
>>>> 
>>>> Pros:
>>>> * This is what we currently do which IMO means it’s the more natural way
>>>> * Makes content more visible when editing inside xwiki since it takes
>>> less horizontal space
>>>> * Less typing and less chance to make it wrong
>>>> 
>>>> Option A-2: Top level indentation
>>>> ========================
>>>> 
>>>> {{velocity}}
>>>> #set ($var = …)
>>>> #if (…)
>>>>   …
>>>>   #if (…)
>>>>   #end
>>>> #end
>>>> {{/velocity}}
>>>> 
>>>> Nested example:
>>>> 
>>>> {{velocity}}
>>>> #if ($doc.fullName != 'XWiki.AdminInlineSheet')
>>>>   #set($formname = 'inline')
>>>>   #set($saveaction = 'save')
>>>>   #set($previewenabled = true)
>>>>   #set($xnotification = $!request.getParameter('xnotification'))
>>>>   {{html}}
>>>>     <form id="inline" method="post" action="$doc.getURL('preview’)">
>>>>       <div>
>>>>       …
>>>> {{/velocity}}
>>>> 
>>>> Pros:
>>>> * More logical since a macro is a container (even though it’s different
>>> syntax - wiki markup vs velocity - so it’s arguable)
>>>> * More legible?
>>>> 
>>>> Cons
>>>> * This means slowly changing everywhere we use scripting.
>>>> 
>>>> WDYT?
>>>> 
>>>> I think my preference goes to A-1 FTM since I’ve never thought to myself
>>> that it was an issue all these years of using it.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -Vincent
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Thomas Mortagne

Reply via email to