If we were to export PDFs of documentation at a certain version than I would agree with this. Currently my feeling is that we are deleting information and not all our users are on LTS or recent versions.
I agree is important to have the most simple and clear documentation, yet it's bad that we don't provide versioned documentation. Also, even cleaning now, it's a task that is very big and the info will get deprecated in a year. If the language we use is using present tense, users will still be confused 1 year later and still would not know about what version that documentation is talking about. Especially since there is no way we could validate documentation on year release. I don't have a clear solution for this problem. Thanks, Caty On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote: > Sure, make sense. > > I guess most document useless in >=LTS should be removed. Unless the > documentation is designed to give the version information of for > changelog stuff. > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I think we need to start removing old mentions on xwiki.org. It makes > it harder to read xwiki pages (as a user has just reported, see > https://forum.xwiki.org/t/how-to-increase-active-installs- > of-xwiki/3132/6?u=vmassol). > > > > Also we said we don't support documenting old stuff (we only support doc > for LTS, stable and latest). > > > > For example I just did this: > > http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/ > AdminGuide/Installation/InstallationConcludingSteps/? > viewer=changes&rev1=11.2&rev2=11.3 > > > > Is that ok with everyone? > > > > Thanks > > -Vincent > > > > > > -- > Thomas Mortagne >
