Please note that the original goal here was not to discuss what we would do if 
we were a large project with lots of developers, who liked to write 
documentation, etc :)

The goal was:
1) to answer the feedback we got from a reader saying that we have too many 
distractions when reading xwiki wiki pages and that they break the visual flow 
and make the pages harder to read, all this in an offer to bring in more users 
and increase the active installs.
2) to implement what we decided a long time ago, ie. support only 3 branches, 
see https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Support#HSupportedVersions

One relatively simple alternative if we really don’t want to remove some 
information could be:

* Implement a {{backwardCompatibilityMacro/}} wiki macro on xwiki.org that you 
would use to put information about previous versions of XWiki
* When viewing it, it would be folded by default with some small clickable 
indicator/icon in the gutter (or somewhere else), which, when clicked, would 
make it visible. Another option would be a “show backward compat info” toggle 
somewhere in the page UI.

I still prefer a lot to remove old stuff and to continue our strategy of only 
supporting 3 branches and to push users to upgrades to those 3 branches because 
that’s one way of participating to the XWiki  open source project as it makes 
users test those versions and upgrade.

Thanks
-Vincent

> On 18 Jun 2018, at 13:19, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think we need to start removing old mentions on xwiki.org. It makes it 
> harder to read xwiki pages (as a user has just reported, see 
> https://forum.xwiki.org/t/how-to-increase-active-installs-of-xwiki/3132/6?u=vmassol).
>  
> 
> Also we said we don't support documenting old stuff (we only support doc for 
> LTS, stable and latest). 
> 
> For example I just did this: 
> http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/AdminGuide/Installation/InstallationConcludingSteps/?viewer=changes&rev1=11.2&rev2=11.3
>  
> 
> Is that ok with everyone?
> 
> Thanks
> -Vincent
> 

Reply via email to