+1 Thanks, Marius
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Eduard Moraru <enygma2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, devs. > > We have had 2 previous discussions on this topic: > * July 2016 (discussion): https://markmail.org/thread/oodciq7pv6pj7eic > * Jan 2018 (proposal): https://markmail.org/thread/ymwsebvr3k7voy3p > > And we have at least 2 issues on this topic: > * Oct 2011: XWIKI-7058 <http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-7058>: Page > creation date should be the date of the installation > * Feb 2015: XCOMMONS-1447 <https://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XCOMMONS-1447>: > XAR plugin should replace the dates with a common number > > TL;DR: It's causing confusion for our users to install pages that are > created in 2005/2009/etc. so we should avoid committing dates on git that > users might end up installing. > > Reminder: Importing a document with empty dates will: > * Use the current date if the document is new (i.e. does not exist in the > wiki) > * Use the existing dates if the document already exists in the wiki, if > using backup import > * Use the current user and current date for the document update date, if > imported using non-backup import of EM extension install > > Adel and myself have extended the xar:verify and xar:format goals of the > xar plugin to check for the existence of date fields in the XML wiki pages > and to remove them. The fields are: > * date > * contentUpdateDate > * creationDate > * attachment/date > > See the PR https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/pull/44/ > > This check (on both verify and format goals) is skippable entirely with the > "xar.dates.skip property" (default to false) or > "xar.dates.skip.documentList" for individual documents (list of doc > references). > > I need your vote for accepting the existing PR and for removing the > document dates (e.g. https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/792) and > your feedback in case you know of any problems that this might create. > > Also, please mention if you would prefer for this behavior to be skipped by > default (and explicitly enabled on XWiki Standard, so that 3rd party code > is not impacted by this change). > > Here's my +1 (enabled by default and skippable if needed). > > Thanks, > Eduard >