Hi, > Well the cool kids like James Strachan and Kamesh Sampath are telling me > that xhyve is super awesome and I would be better looking, thinner and 10 > years younger if I just tried it :-)
LOL. I wonder why it is supposedly cool. It is known to misbehave and it does not even have a management console, leaving me sometimes wildly guessing on what's going on. At least VirtualBox and Hyper-V offer me some way to inspect/manage virtual machines. I've heard xhyve is performs better. Personally I have not tests this nor seen any numbers. Given that I prefer a more stable environment over one which might or might not perform a bit better, I stick to VirtualBox for now. > I do not even know what files to go delete...but I do see it misbehaving. That might help in some cases - https://minishift.io/docs/troubleshooting.html#xhyve-driver > CDK 2.2+ uses more CPU than before - I stuck with CDK 2.1 until Jan 2017 > for demos :-) I would love to know why, but trying to find the problem with CDK 2.2+ seems pointless. I'd rather see us working out how you can give the same presentation using Minishift with a decent performance. If we could get you to use Minishift and you tell us that it performs ways worse than CDK 2.1, we will for sure look into it. --Hardy
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devtools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools
