Anything can be wrapped in a Maven plugin. It would be preferable if it was not a Maven plugin, then it just might be usable outside of that target audience.
-aslak- On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 11:22 PM Gorkem Ercan <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 11 Jun 2018, at 10:04, Andrew Lee Rubinger wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 4:48 AM, Burr Sutter <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Based on the "other thread"... > >> > >> It does seem to me that fabric8-maven-plugin is mission critical to > >> our > >> developer experience. > >> > > > > Or at least some incarnation of a Java language-specific adaptor to > > oc, yes. > > > > What do you mean by adaptor? Are we still assuming a maven plugin or > something else? > > > > S, > > ALR > > > > > >> > >> So, for the parties who have been "naysayers", can we drop the "nays" > >> and > >> focus just on "making it more awesome"? > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 3:06 PM, Max Andersen <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Roland - if you are seeing OpenShift.io based fixes that don’t > >>> make > >>> sense please speak up. I didn’t see any feedback on the roadmap > >>> request for > >>> inputs. > >>> > >>> The intent is for sure not to diverge away. We want to work together > >>> on > >>> this rather than see even more new forks. > >>> > >>> And yes gofabric8 etc. is also not of use for us. > >>> > >>> The whole images situation we should work on aligning as that also > >>> relate > >>> to middleware etc. > >>> > >>> > >>> /max > >>> http://about.me/maxandersen > >>> > >>> > >>> On 16 May 2018, at 18:44, Roland Huss <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Burr, > >>> > >>> let me try to comment from a Fuse perspective: > >>> > >>> * We are still committed to the fabric8 base images (s2i [1] and > >>> non-s2i > >>> [2]) as they are the only community images available. We will > >>> continue to > >>> use them in the future FIS releases (at least upstream). > >>> > >>> * The fabric8-maven-plugin's [3] scope has diverged from our use > >>> cases, > >>> so we plan to explore new ways of providing a way to leverage > >>> OpenShift > >>> builds and deployments for the FIS quickstarts. I.e. fmp's scope > >>> gets > >>> aligned currently to its usage in openshift.io, drifting away from > >>> being > >>> a general purpose plugin. Also, many features (like gofabric8, helm, > >>> cluster installation, .. support) are of no use for us, so we don't > >>> want to > >>> maintain them for no obvious reason. > >>> We have some initial ideas, but nothing concrete. So happy to start > >>> a > >>> discussion with Devtools, RHOAR and you how to align plans. > >>> > >>> * Fabric8's docker-maven-plugin [4] will be still supported in the > >>> upstream (it has been productised only as an integral part of f-m-p) > >>> > >>> These our current plan but we too are interested in what the dev > >>> tools > >>> team is planning on doing, of course. > >>> > >>> regards ... > >>> ... roland > >>> > >>> [1]: https://github.com/fabric8io-images/s2i > >>> [2]: https://github.com/fabric8io-images/java > >>> [3]: https://github.com/fabric8io/fabric8-maven-plugin > >>> [4]: https://github.com/fabric8io/docker-maven-plugin > >>> > >>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 9:45 PM Burr Sutter <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Did we ever come to agreement on keeping F8 alive? > >>>> > >>>> Specifically the > >>>> base docker images > >>>> maven plugin > >>>> > >>>> bit.ly/msa-instructions still relies on these tools and that is > >>>> still > >>>> one of our most successful assets (seen in > >>>> bit.ly/microservicesvideo) > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Devtools mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools > >>>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Devtools mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools > >>> > >>> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Devtools mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Twitter: @ALRubinger > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Devtools mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools > > _______________________________________________ > Devtools mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools >
_______________________________________________ Devtools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools
