On 13 Jun 2018, at 16:46, Aslak Knutsen wrote:
> Anything can be wrapped in a Maven plugin. > > It would be preferable if it was not a Maven plugin, then it just might be > usable outside of that target audience. Sure, I meant whether we are assuming a maven plugin as a deliverable? > > -aslak- > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 11:22 PM Gorkem Ercan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On 11 Jun 2018, at 10:04, Andrew Lee Rubinger wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 4:48 AM, Burr Sutter <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Based on the "other thread"... >>>> >>>> It does seem to me that fabric8-maven-plugin is mission critical to >>>> our >>>> developer experience. >>>> >>> >>> Or at least some incarnation of a Java language-specific adaptor to >>> oc, yes. >>> >> >> What do you mean by adaptor? Are we still assuming a maven plugin or >> something else? >> >> >>> S, >>> ALR >>> >>> >>>> >>>> So, for the parties who have been "naysayers", can we drop the "nays" >>>> and >>>> focus just on "making it more awesome"? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 3:06 PM, Max Andersen <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Roland - if you are seeing OpenShift.io based fixes that don’t >>>>> make >>>>> sense please speak up. I didn’t see any feedback on the roadmap >>>>> request for >>>>> inputs. >>>>> >>>>> The intent is for sure not to diverge away. We want to work together >>>>> on >>>>> this rather than see even more new forks. >>>>> >>>>> And yes gofabric8 etc. is also not of use for us. >>>>> >>>>> The whole images situation we should work on aligning as that also >>>>> relate >>>>> to middleware etc. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> /max >>>>> http://about.me/maxandersen >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 16 May 2018, at 18:44, Roland Huss <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Burr, >>>>> >>>>> let me try to comment from a Fuse perspective: >>>>> >>>>> * We are still committed to the fabric8 base images (s2i [1] and >>>>> non-s2i >>>>> [2]) as they are the only community images available. We will >>>>> continue to >>>>> use them in the future FIS releases (at least upstream). >>>>> >>>>> * The fabric8-maven-plugin's [3] scope has diverged from our use >>>>> cases, >>>>> so we plan to explore new ways of providing a way to leverage >>>>> OpenShift >>>>> builds and deployments for the FIS quickstarts. I.e. fmp's scope >>>>> gets >>>>> aligned currently to its usage in openshift.io, drifting away from >>>>> being >>>>> a general purpose plugin. Also, many features (like gofabric8, helm, >>>>> cluster installation, .. support) are of no use for us, so we don't >>>>> want to >>>>> maintain them for no obvious reason. >>>>> We have some initial ideas, but nothing concrete. So happy to start >>>>> a >>>>> discussion with Devtools, RHOAR and you how to align plans. >>>>> >>>>> * Fabric8's docker-maven-plugin [4] will be still supported in the >>>>> upstream (it has been productised only as an integral part of f-m-p) >>>>> >>>>> These our current plan but we too are interested in what the dev >>>>> tools >>>>> team is planning on doing, of course. >>>>> >>>>> regards ... >>>>> ... roland >>>>> >>>>> [1]: https://github.com/fabric8io-images/s2i >>>>> [2]: https://github.com/fabric8io-images/java >>>>> [3]: https://github.com/fabric8io/fabric8-maven-plugin >>>>> [4]: https://github.com/fabric8io/docker-maven-plugin >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 9:45 PM Burr Sutter <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Did we ever come to agreement on keeping F8 alive? >>>>>> >>>>>> Specifically the >>>>>> base docker images >>>>>> maven plugin >>>>>> >>>>>> bit.ly/msa-instructions still relies on these tools and that is >>>>>> still >>>>>> one of our most successful assets (seen in >>>>>> bit.ly/microservicesvideo) >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Devtools mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Devtools mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Devtools mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Twitter: @ALRubinger >> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devtools mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Devtools mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools >> _______________________________________________ Devtools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools
