On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, Arjan Molenaar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "After a good time of programming I have reached a point where I can
> proudly anounce DiaCanvas".
> I don't know if you folks are happy with the name... I choose it because
> it looks like DIA's canvas and acts like it as much as possible... Under
> the hood however it's not that much the same: I've basically
> reimplemented DiaObject and the tools. I've tried to get it closer to
> GTK and separate it from DIA's architecture (which is very nice, but
> didn't fit my needs (not generic enough)). So... I don't know if
> DiaCanvas is quite right. It looks the same, but when you start creating
> your own objects, you'll find some difficulties (not much, some...).
>
> Any comments?
I have no problems with calling it DiaCanvas, but it might be confusing.
Depends a bit on how you're gonna use and 'market' it i suppose.
> PS. maybe GmeCanvas... since my major project is GME
Well... It's not very easy to say (gee-em-ee canvas?).
/ Alex
