Alexander Larsson wrote:
>
> On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, Arjan Molenaar wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > "After a good time of programming I have reached a point where I can
> > proudly anounce DiaCanvas".
> > I don't know if you folks are happy with the name... I choose it because
> > it looks like DIA's canvas and acts like it as much as possible... Under
> > the hood however it's not that much the same: I've basically
> > reimplemented DiaObject and the tools. I've tried to get it closer to
> > GTK and separate it from DIA's architecture (which is very nice, but
> > didn't fit my needs (not generic enough)). So... I don't know if
> > DiaCanvas is quite right. It looks the same, but when you start creating
> > your own objects, you'll find some difficulties (not much, some...).
> >
> > Any comments?
>
> I have no problems with calling it DiaCanvas, but it might be confusing.
> Depends a bit on how you're gonna use and 'market' it i suppose.
>
> > PS. maybe GmeCanvas... since my major project is GME
>
> Well... It's not very easy to say (gee-em-ee canvas?).
Hi,
Sorry for the late response...
Well... After looking at the code again I decided to keep it DiaCanvas
for a while. This will save me some work too ;-). I'm not yet releasing
it... First I have to create a CreateTool again...
Well... Thanx anyway,
yours,
_A_
Arjan
--
It's a GNU world after all (Walt Disney).
